lunes, 17 de noviembre de 2008

"Waiting for Godot" Final Essay


“Waiting for Godot”
Many people could say that the Tragicomedy “Waiting for Godot” written by Samuel Beckett, doesn’t have any purpose or even its dialogues don’t have any sense. But actually the play has a sense and a purpose that maybe is not implicit and as readers is difficult to discover at once. The play carries out with its intention because it calls our attention since its dialogues and its characters. Also as we know, readers are used to read texts that follow a structure and a specific pattern so as to cause impact, the author wanted to write the play in a non sense way in order to create something particularly different.
As it was mentioned before in the introduction, “Waiting for Godot” is a tragicomedy play. If we analyze the word Tragicomedy, it refers to tragedy and comedy, so we can infer that the play is a mixture of both styles. The characters present so many problems in the story that as readers we can consider it as funny or as a joke. Maybe because readers can think that it is unbelievable that the characters have to confront so many problems in such a short time.
To have a better understand of the play we must identify some essential information that respects on its author and the historical approach in which the play is developed. First of all, we must say that Samuel Beckett was, “an Irish writer, dramatist and poet. Beckett's work offers a bleak outlook on human culture, and both formally and philosophically became increasingly minimalist. Beckett is considered as a modernist writer, for other as a postmodernists writer and also one of the key writers in what Martin Esslin called "Theatre of the Absurd".”[1] We can infer that it wasn’t only his play called “Waiting for Godot” his different way of writing. Beckett as an author impose another way of writing and making plays very different from what people were used to read and watch in a play. Also is very interesting to know that the “Waiting for Godot” was written after the Second World War II in which people were very sensible and affected because of all the implications that a war brings. So we can observe that the play has two possible purposes, one could it be that it tries to show us how people were affected after war, desolated and very sensible. Also we can think that the author want to make people have a good time by laughing at their own problems in order to alleviate and relieve.[2]
“Waiting for Godot” can have a lot of different interpretations depending in the reader. In view of my catholic raising, I focus my reading on what Catholics called the purgatory. This is a none well defined place where Catholics believe that after we die we go to this special place to relieve ourselves of small and simple sins in order to go to heaven. Maybe for some readers this vision could be absurd and ridiculous but for many Catholics, the play shows how we think the purgatory would be. The play presents the situation of two men that are looking for Godot, they are very frustrated and they do not understand what is really happening with them and their own performance in the play.
We can identify many elements in the story that can help me to support my thesis of the play. Firstly, the play narrates the situation of two men that are looking for someone called “Godot”. Firstly, I must say that while I was reading the play I related the name “Godot” with “God” mainly because of the word but after I finish reading the play I could identify that it perfectly fits with my interpretation of the play.
We can also identify that Vladimir and Estragon are looking for Godot in unknown road where they do not even know if they have been there. The road presents characteristics very similar to the ones that the purgatory is shown by Catholics. Mainly because it is unknown and nobody have too much information and an explanation for it. Also because it is a place where they can identify there own acts and their own errors but they do not understand much why they are doing although they know that they have a purpose, meeting Godot.
At the beginning of the play, Estragon has a big difficult to take out his boots. As readers we can interpret this element as a heavy load that he had in his life that he is trying to get rid of in this special place because they are a nuisance for his path. Through all the play we can observe that Estragon and Vladimir are desolated and with a particular feeling of not knowing anything and not remember anything. For me as a reader this loose of memory is understandable because they have to get rid of their past. In there path to heaven they forget about whom they were before in their past life, now they are new persons in a new life without sins and reaching what ever catholic wants to.
To conclude, we must say that “Waiting for Godot” is a very interesting play for everyone who wants some answers written in another vision very different from reality. My point of view in relation with the play could be very different from the ones that other can have depending in their believes or even seen from a different perception of life. It is very important to read this play being aware of the different elements that it presents in order to captivate the readers and make us think more about its real meaning and purpose. The play make us part of it because it tries to make us also feel a little bit desolated because sometime it is very confusing and it does not have one clear way to read it. As readers we must be open minded and try to figure out more than one vision of things in order to be more critical thinkers.
Sources
· http://www.uahdramaclass.blogspot.com/
· http://samuel-beckett.net/Waiting_for_Godot_Part1.html
· http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waiting_for_Godot
· http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Beckett
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Beckett
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waiting_for_Godot

miércoles, 12 de noviembre de 2008

"Waiting for Godot"

“Waiting for Godot”
Many people could say that the Tragicomedy “Waiting for Godot” written by Samuel Beckett, doesn’t have any purpose or even its dialogues don’t have any sense. But actually the play has a sense and a purpose that maybe is not implicit and as readers is difficult to discover at once. The play carries out with its intention because it calls our attention since its dialogues and its characters. Also as we know, readers are used to read texts that follow a structure and a specific pattern so as to cause impact, the author wanted to write the play in a non sense way in order to create something particularly different.
As it was mentioned before in the introduction, “Waiting for Godot” is a tragicomedy play. If we analyze the word Tragicomedy, it refers to tragedy and comedy, so we can infer that the play is a mixture of both styles. The characters present so many problems in the story that as readers we can consider it as funny or as a joke. Maybe because readers can think that it is unbelievable that the characters have to confront so many problems in such a short time.
To have a better understand of the play we must identify some essential information that respects on its author and the historical approach in which the play is developed. First of all, we must say that Samuel Beckett was, “an Irish writer, dramatist and poet. Beckett's work offers a bleak outlook on human culture, and both formally and philosophically became increasingly minimalist. Beckett is considered as a modernist writer, for other as a postmodernists writer and also one of the key writers in what Martin Esslin called "Theatre of the Absurd".”[1] We can infer that it wasn’t only his play called “Waiting for Godot” his different way of writing. Beckett as an author impose another way of writing and making plays very different from what people were used to read and watch in a play. Also is very interesting to know that the “Waiting for Godot” was written after the Second World War II in which people were very sensible and affected because of all the implications that a war brings. So we can observe that the play has two possible purposes, one could it be that it tries to show us how people were affected after war, desolated and very sensible. Also we can think that the author want to make people have a good time by laughing at their own problems in order to alleviate and relieve.[2]
“Waiting for Godot” can have a lot of different interpretations depending in the reader. In view of my catholic raising, I focus my reading on what Catholics called the purgatory. This is a non well defined place where Catholics believe that after we die we go to this special place to relieve ourselves of

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Beckett
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waiting_for_Godot

jueves, 6 de noviembre de 2008

"Outline"


I. Introduction


II. Writing style


III. Readers interpretation


IV. Important elements and its meanings


V. Conclusions

miércoles, 29 de octubre de 2008

Spender v/s Auden



Both authors wrote poems concerning political and historical topics. In the poem called September 1, 1939 written by W.H.Auden, there are many important themes as world war II, patriotism and politicism. It shows a strong feeling of patriotism which is reflected on a flag always clean and up no matter what. However, it also mention different issues as corruption and also some things and persons that makes a country get dirty. On the other hand, the poem called In no man´s land, written by Stephen Spender, shows a land that it is able to change, able to go beyond and let behind past problems and issues. Also I think that the tittle is very important because it implies that people are fighting against something unknown, something that its not even their business because it belongs to no one.
I think that both authors want to show us the importance of knowing and reflect about the historical events that have happened in our coutry and what join us as citizens. Also not forgetting about important events that happened in the past in order to not commit the same mistakes. The authors want to make us conscious of what is our position as citizens, trying to change the bad things and letting the evil far away fromour dreams as a person, members of a society.

miércoles, 22 de octubre de 2008

"Virginia Woolf"


Almost every presentation had very interesting topics, concerning with Feminism, women novels and new thoughts. It´s amazing how women had been discriminating just because being a women! I agree with Virgina Woolf in the fact that women were hidden for many years because society didn´t let her express themselves, instead of they were at home doing the housekeeping and taking care of family. After 1920´s women possition in society changed, women suffrage was admitted and women were not considerated only as a housekeepers. All this changes happened because they wanted to change, they wanted to study and work and because they think that they were not the weaker sex.

Women begun to write about different topics related with feminism, lesbianism, society and discrimination. After many years we can identify that there are many good women writers but nothing compared with William Shakespeare. I am sure that this is going to change in a near future because each day there are many women that are more interested in Literature and many topics that before were just considerated only by men.

lunes, 13 de octubre de 2008

Correction......2

"The Rocking-Horse Winner"
It is unbelievable how people are always thinking about money and richness. Sometimes people spend all their life trying to become richer and more powerful, never realizing that those things are not fundamental in life. We must value significant things as family, friends, values, religion, etc.
In the story the word lucky is directly related with money and richness but the truth is that money can bring us pain and suffer. Being lucky is not having more money is when we are happy and we are grateful with what we have. Money do not make us happier, indeed I think most of the people really enjoy life when they live with the necessary things to survive and their worries are emphasized on relationships, faith, God and enjoying life as real sons of God.

Correction.....1

Creating as God??? (Frankestein) ---Correction

Each day we get impressed with the wide variety of new invents and discoveries. Nowadays technology has shown the world that almost nothing is impossible. Human beings want to control everything and want to show the world that they are able to do anything.The story wants to show us that not everything is possible. We are human beings and because of this we make mistakes all the time and we do have limits because we are not perfect as God does.The author “did not believe that all knowledge was “good” knowledge and instead thought that there were some areas that were beyond human understanding and should not be pursued.” Maybe we need to know that some things are not understandable and do not have a reason. We need to know our limits in order to continue with our natural process as human beings. We can not live trying to attempt against natural laws and trying to compare ourselves with God.